Verfijn uw zoekresultaat

Zoekresultaat: 603 artikelen

x
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:
Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen x
Titel

Notariaat, ethiek en marktwerking

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 03 2005
Trefwoorden Notaris, Marktwerking, Kantoorruimte, Kwaliteit, Tuchtrecht, Kamer van toezicht, Ambt, Toezicht, Innovatie, Introductie
Auteurs Laclé, Z.D.

Laclé, Z.D.
Boekbespreking

NV Terreur; de nieuwe economie van de terreur

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 02 2005
Trefwoorden Inkomen, Drug, Auteur, Illegaal, Legaliteit, Uitgave, Handelaar, Opium, Wapen, Bank
Auteurs Scheepmaker, M.P.C.

Scheepmaker, M.P.C.
Titel

Ronselen in Europa voor de Heilige Oorlog

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 02 2005
Trefwoorden Internet, Website, Gevangenis, Ouders, Bestuurder, Explosieven, Gedetineerde, Aansprakelijkheid, Armoede, Auteur
Auteurs Leeuwen, M. van

Leeuwen, M. van
Titel

Drugshandel en politiek geweld

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 02 2005
Trefwoorden Drugshandel, Geweld, Drug, Ondernemer, Betaling, Cannabis, Regering, Bewijslast, Causaliteit, Consument
Auteurs Veen, H.T. van der

Veen, H.T. van der
Titel

Het islamistische terrorisme: Percepties wieden en kweekvijvers dreggen

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 02 2005
Trefwoorden Bedreiging, Arbeider, Regering, Auteur, Aansprakelijkheid, Geweld, Identiteit, Nalatenschap, Politie, Slachtoffer
Auteurs Coolsaet, R.

Coolsaet, R.
Titel

Kan de gewelddadige jihad zonder sympathisanten?

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 02 2005
Trefwoorden Internet, Illegaal, Aanwijzing, Verblijfsvergunning, Bankieren, Inkomen, Legaliteit, Auteur, Financiering, Geweld
Auteurs Mascini, P. en Verhoeven, M.

Mascini, P.

Verhoeven, M.

    Using the concept of chronocentrism, the doctrine that what is current must somehow be superior to what went on before, that ideas, scholars and scholarship inevitably become stale and discredited over time, the author argues the rise and attraction of nodal governance and nodal security fits the definition of chronocentrism. The recent ‘discovery’ of a multitude of (semi-)public agencies and private sector actors performing police functions neglect the fact that many of these agencies and actors have a long standing history (sometimes more than a century) and have been subject of many academic studies. Moreover, these studies are richer in their theoretical foundations because of the explanations they give for different functions, goals, interests, cultures and operational styles of public policing, administrative policing and private policing than much of the current language. In many ways nodal governance and nodal security are new labels for ongoing processes of gradual interweaving of different forms of policing. For this reason the use of these concepts is useful in two ways. First, for policy makers and practitioners. For them the new concepts seem to have a function as a motivational strategy. For instance, what was called increasing cooperation in the justice system (ketensamenwerking) and public-private cooperation in the eighties and nineties are revitalized using new labels. Second, nodal governance and nodal security, in the academic community ‘forces’ us to rethink the very notion of policing. Policing increasingly takes place in hybrid organizations and processes in which boundaries between public administration, public policing, regulatory agencies and private security are blurring.


A.B. Hoogenboom
Prof. dr. Bob Hoogenboom is hoogleraar Politiestudies en Veiligheidsvraagstukken aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam en hoogleraar Forensic Business Studies aan Nyenrode.
Artikel

Onder de mensen

De aanpak van transportcriminaliteit door politie, verzekeraars en schade-experts

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 1 2009
Auteurs M.B. Schuilenburg, A. Coenraads en P. Van Calster
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article discusses what is left aside in the perspective of nodal governance: namely the adaptability and dynamics of social reality itself. The challenge is to research ‘what actually happens’ without reducing it to collective structures or specific frameworks in advance. Previous to specific structures (‘teams’) and frameworks (‘meetings’, ‘contracts’) there is constant change, movement and difference. By using the work of the French sociologist Gabriel Tarde (1843-1904) the authors research how the nodes police, insurers and loss adjusters cooperate in the fight against transport criminality and how interactions between these nodes take content and shape. Consequently, their cooperation is not interpreted as a static theme, but rather as a dynamic process that requires constant interpretation in terms of relationships, unexpected events, adaptations and coincidences. On the basis of fifteen in-depth interviews the authors show in which way a ‘new language’ with ‘new mechanisms’ originates within the cooperation. As a consequence, ‘informal contacts’, ‘goals and interests’, ‘mutual confidence’ and ‘information-exchange’, which play an important role between the nodes, are constantly re-defined.


M.B. Schuilenburg
Mr. drs. Marc Schuilenburg doceert aan de vakgroep Criminologie van de Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam.

A. Coenraads
Annerieke Coenraads MSc studeerde criminologie aan de Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam. Ze heeft op persoonlijke titel meegeschreven aan deze bijdrage.

P. Van Calster
Dr. Patrick Van Calster is als universitair hoofddocent verbonden aan het departement Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.

    This paper advances a ‘nodal governance’ perspective, which understands the delivery of security as being accomplished through the thinking and practices of various ‘nodes’ or entities characterized by ways of thinking about problems and influencing events. In this light, policing should be understood sociologically as involving the activities of state and non-state entities (e.g. corporations and well-resourced communities) as well as the public police. The authors argue that it is essential for police to recognize the nodal world within which they live and to locate themselves within ‘nodal assemblages’ for the delivery of security. As illustrations, the paper discusses two practical projects devoted to exploring nodal security governance arrangements in the country contexts of South Africa and Australia. The authors add that the question of what precisely nodal policing can or should look like in concrete terms is an empirical matter to be resolved within site-specific contexts.


J. Wood
Prof. Jennifer Wood is als hoogleraar verbonden aan het Department of Criminal Justice van de Australische Temple University.

C.D. Shearing
Prof. Clifford Shearing is hoogleraar bij het Centre of Criminology van de University of Cape Town, Zuid-Afrika.

    This article focuses on the question whether the nodal governance perspective is a useful and insightful instrument to analyse the growing involvement and responsibilities of a multitude of public and private actors in creating public safety and security. Subsequently the author applies the basics of nodal governance to experiences with local security networks in the Netherlands. His conclusion is that the nodal governance perspective has a number of shortcomings. One of these is an underestimation of the crucial role of the police in local security networks. Also, important obstacles to civilian participation in security networks are overlooked. Moreover, the nodal governance thinking doesn't deal with the problem of democratic control of private actors involved in security networks and the absence of guarantees that they will pursue security not only for themselves but for the community as a whole.


J. Terpstra
Dr. Jan Terpstra is verbonden aan het Criminologisch Instituut van de Radboud Universiteit in Nijmegen.

    Since the last decennium, the government has stopped being the only organizer and executor of issues of safety and security. After all, as a result of developments on a social, cultural, economical and geographical level, the way of coping with problems of danger and insecurity changed. These new developments and ways of coping can not be grasped in terms of a devaluation of government competence. Instead, new ways of governance came into existence, with their own dynamics and autonomy. In this contribution, we will elaborate on the concept of ‘Burgernet’, that is a hybrid network in which civilians, the police and the municipalities come together for tackling problems of insecurity. The concept of nodal governance will turn out to be a helpful tool in the analyses.


P. Van Calster
Dr. Patrick Van Calster is universitair hoofddocent aan het departement Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.

M.B. Schuilenburg
Mr. drs. Marc Schuilenburg doceert aan de afdeling Criminologie van de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Redactioneel

Voorwoord

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 2 2009
Auteurs M.P.C. Scheepmaker

M.P.C. Scheepmaker
Artikel

Met de blik van de rechter

Juridische overwegingen aangaande de ISD-maatregel

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 2 2009
Auteurs K.D. Lünnemann
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The primary objective of the ISD Order is to reduce public nuisance caused by extremely persistent offenders. Another objective is to reduce recidivism. Recidivism can be prevented by influencing behaviour, with due regard to any personal issues involved. In this article the author looks at the arguments the judiciary uses to impose or end an ISD Order. The author notices that the judiciary views ISD Orders as a last resort: an order is given only in the absence of alternatives, and with the requirement attached that ISD subjects are to be put on a programme. The judiciary considers rehabilitation within an ISD framework to be extremely important. The orders are almost invariably imposed for two years, with no deduction of the pretrial detention period. There is reason to terminate the order if the recidivism risk has receded, but there may be other termination grounds, outside the control of the ISD subject, such as negligence on the part of a government agency.


K.D. Lünnemann
Mr. dr. Katinka Lünnemann is werkzaam bij het Verwey-Jonker Instituut als senior onderzoeker en themacoördinator recht, bescherming en preventie.
Artikel

Tussen hoop en vrees

ISD'ers aan het woord

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 2 2009
Auteurs W.M.E.H. Beijers en L.S.M. Rutjens
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The authors report on a content analysis of semi-structured interviews with twenty-two offenders who had been placed under a special measure in an Institution for Persistent Offenders (ISD). While the sample cannot be considered representative for all ISD offenders, the majority consider the ISD measure useful, mainly for utilitarian reasons. Most offenders want to break with their old life. Prominent in their reports is the relevance attached to proper housing arrangements. Those placed in wards with regular detainees where (hard) drugs are reportedly easily available, regard ISD as less useful.


W.M.E.H. Beijers
Drs. Guillaume Beijers (universitair docent en coördinator van de opleiding Criminologie) is verbonden aan de afdeling Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

L.S.M. Rutjens
Mr. Linda Rutjens (docent) is verbonden aan de afdeling Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Redactioneel

Voorwoord

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 4 2009
Auteurs F.C.J. van der Doelen, E. Niemeijer en M.P.C. Scheepmaker
Auteursinformatie

F.C.J. van der Doelen
Dr. Frans van der Doelen is werkzaam bij de Directie Rechtsbestel van het ministerie van Justitie en is sinds 2006 de Nederlandse vertegenwoordiger in de European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) van de Raad van Europa.

E. Niemeijer
Prof. dr. mr. Bert Niemeijer is werkzaam bij de directie Algemene Justitiële Strategie en lid van de redactieraad van Justitiële verkenningen.

M.P.C. Scheepmaker
Drs. Marit Scheepmaker is hoofdredacteur van Justitiële verkenningen

    This article focuses on the growing need internationally for accountability of the administration of justice. The CEPEJ report European judicial systems compares the judiciary in the member states of the Council of Europe showing how this justification takes place. Accounting for the administration of justice still involves a lot of attention for the input and the procedures, while accountability for the results is most important. New methods for measuring the experiences of users of the administration of justice are developing. This fits a trend in which hierarchic and internal accountability, for instance through appeal procedures, are becoming less important in favour of horizontal accountability towards stakeholders, colleagues and users of state services.


M. Barendrecht
Prof. mr. dr. Maurits Barendrecht is als hoogleraar privaatrecht verbonden aan de Universiteit van Tilburg.

    There is a growing consensus among practitioners that independent peer review is the preferred approach to furthering trust in the legal professions. The article draws on experience abroad, as reported in the professional literature, and lessons from comparable arrangements at home, in academia and the medical professions. It formulates an institutional design in which an autonomous agency, independent of the Lawyers' Association and at arms' length from the Minister of Justice, develops methodology and organizes peer reviews by fellow-practitioners. Since professionals, everywhere, like to share experience, it is argued that making site-visits, sampling case-files, and discussing a self-evaluation of the practice under review promotes open innovation and creates scope for shaping rather than controlling professional excellence. It also allows for discretion in catering to the widely diverging needs of large international law firms and small local practices that a system of command and control could not deliver.


D.J. Wolfson
Prof. dr. Dirk Wolfson is verbonden aan de afdeling Bestuurskunde van de Erasmus Universiteit en werkzaam als visitator, onder andere bij woningcorporaties.
Redactioneel

Voorwoord

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 3 2009
Auteurs H. G. van de Bunt, D. Siegel en M.P.C. Scheepmaker
Auteursinformatie

H. G. van de Bunt
Prof. dr. Henk van de Bunt is als hoogleraar criminologie verbonden aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

D. Siegel
Prof. dr. Dina Siegel is als hoogleraar criminologie verbonden aan de Universiteit Utrecht.

M.P.C. Scheepmaker
Drs. Marit Scheepmaker is hoofdredacteur van Justitiële verkenningen.

    This article deals with chapter 13 of the CEPEJ report European judicial systems on the execution of court decisions. Unfortunately the report doesn't answer the question how far court decisions are being executed. The report does give information on organisations and agents involved in the enforcement of court decisions. The author gives an impression of the big differences existing between European countries in this field. Most important is the distinction between states where the responsibility for enforcement lies with public authorities and those where this responsibility is left to private agencies. The CEPEJ report seems to suggest that various European countries do a lot more than the Netherlands to guarantee that the law actually takes its course. In the Netherlands state responsibility is limited to the maintenance of means which can be used by parties - for their own cost and risk - in order to compel the execution of a court decision.


R.J.J. Eshuis
Dr. Roland Eshuis is werkzaam als onderzoeker bij het WODC. Hij was wetenschappelijk adviseur bij de eerste CEPEJ-studie en verzorgde daarvan de analyse en rapportage.
Toont 561 - 580 van 603 gevonden teksten
1 2 23 24 25 26 27 29 31
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.